What should the Palestinians do so that Israel is not angry!

 Back to strategy. What strategic options do the Palestinians have? Palestinians have seen decades of peaceful struggle and compliance with international law, the world does not listen to their voices. In the past, the PLO fought an armed struggle, resulting in the Oslo Accords, the United States, Israel and the Palestinians agreed in principle on the establishment of two states, but up to now Israel has not paved the way for a Palestinian state. Now tell us what the Palestinians have done. do The Israeli government kills Palestinians day by day, builds new settlements on their land, cuts off their electricity, water and food whenever it wants, yet it is the fault of the Palestinians because the rule of the world is its stick. According to this principle, a farmer should not resist when the Chaudhry of the area takes away his daughter at gunpoint, but he should devise a strategy so that the Chaudhry does not get angry and his The daughter should also come back, even if the farmer's daughter gets pregnant while making this strategy!

Let's be "devil's advocate" today and find answers to some questions. The first question: Hamas attacked Israel with rockets, in response to which Israel bombarded Gaza, should it be understood that Hamas acted foolishly by attacking? Which harmed the Palestinians? Second question: According to the Western media, children have also been martyred in Hamas attacks, so shouldn't such merciless actions be bluntly condemned? Third question: If the Palestinians have to deal with Israel, it is necessary to adopt a wise strategy. Instead of showing this wisdom, groups like Hamas are harming the Palestinian 'cause', is this correct?

Before answering these questions, it is necessary to bring out the hidden assumptions in them. For example, we have assumed that before the attack of Hamas, the Palestinians, although they were under the control of Israel and Israel was occupying their territories, but still their lives were passing peacefully, they got up in the morning and went about their work. They used to go, earn four pennies, sit and eat with their children in Syria, but after the attack of Hamas, nothing but destruction came to them. Egyptian TV anchor and political satirist Basim Youssef blasted this assumption. Bassim Yusuf said that let's imagine a world where there is no Hamas and name that world the West Bank because Hamas does not exist in the West Bank, yet Israel has killed 172 Palestinians there this year, including Children are also included. Therefore, to say that before the attack of Hamas, the narrator was writing China, or that the Palestinians were at least living peacefully in their homes, is completely contrary to the facts. The second assumption is related to the terrorism of Hamas, the Western Media anchors invite supporters of Palestine to their programs and say, "Don't you condemn Hamas outright, and if you don't, it means you have no right to condemn Israel." This comparison is also misleading because this comparison justifies the actions of the Israeli army, while the argument of the Palestinians is that if there is a terrorist in the region, it is the Israeli army that is occupying the land of Palestine and this is an international matter. Proved by the law. In this case, when the Western media focuses on Hamas, it is actually giving Israel a 'blank check' that it now has the full right to bomb Palestinian settlements, which is why the supporters of Israel want the Western media. No anchor called and asked why you guys don't condemn your army's bombing of civilians. In fact, this is the double standard because of which Hamas is not condemned.

Now let's talk about strategy. Supporters of the Palestinian cause are being criticized that if they had adopted a wise strategy, they would not have to see this day. Show that the occupation of the Israeli army will end and they can live in peace and honor! Just saying that the world is ruled by the powerful is not something that reflects wisdom or involves any deep analysis. When you are being oppressed and you know well who is the oppressor and Who is oppressed? The first task of any intellectual is to openly identify the oppressor and raise his voice in favor of the oppressed. If he does not do this and argues that there is no point in raising his voice against the powerful, then he stands on the wrong side of history because he is indirectly supporting the oppressor. This is what American universities are doing today. They are professors whose jobs are as secure as Supreme Court judges, yet they are unable to speak out in support of Palestine. Kar is angry at them, that is why the Howard students who signed the resolution in favor of Palestine are being campaigned against to not give them jobs, not only that, but the Jewish youth from America 'Jihad'. Israel is also coming. So their jihad is jihad and our jihad is terrorism!.

I am not used to arguing from religion in worldly matters, but the religious leaders who are presenting the case that the Palestinians were harmed by the attack of Hamas, I request them to keep in mind the pros and cons of everything in the world. It is not done. The Quraysh of Makkah offered the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) something in which he (ﷺ) had a worldly benefit, but he (ﷺ) replied, "If you put the sun on one hand and the moon on the other hand, I will stand by my position." I will not give up." After the attack by Hamas, it seems that the Palestinians are suffering more, but if you have a strategy, Bismillah, present it, but be careful not to anger Israel, because If he gets angry, which he does at the slightest thing, he will pulverize Gaza and the West Bank with phosphorus bombs. Now tell me what should the Palestinians do?